Valley, Riggin
This text of Valley, Riggin (Valley, Riggin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-91,216-03
EX PARTE RIGGIN GIDEON VALLEY, Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. CR02913 IN THE 42ND DISTRICT COURT FROM COLEMAN COUNTY
Per curiam.
ORDER
Applicant filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and
the district clerk forwarded it to this Court. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07. Under Article
11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, a district clerk is required to forward to this Court,
among other things, “the application, any answers filed, any motions filed, transcripts of all
depositions and hearings, any affidavits, and any other matters such as official records used by the
court in resolving issues of fact.” Id. at § 3(d); see also TEX . R. APP . P. 73.4(b)(4). The record
forwarded to this Court appears, however, to be incomplete. Specifically, the Index to Clerk’s
Record reflects that the record is 96 pages long, while the record before this Court is only 84 pages
long. It appears from the Index that the missing documents include Inmate Correspondence, Bill of 2
Costs, Docket Report, Schedule of Records on Writ of Habeas Corpus, and Clerk’s Certification.
The district clerk shall either forward to this Court the missing pages or certify in writing that
these pages are not part of the record. The district clerk shall comply with this order within thirty
days from the date of this order.
Filed: August 19, 2020 Do not publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Valley, Riggin, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/valley-riggin-texcrimapp-2020.