Valley Oil Co. v. Barberian

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Valley Oil Co. v. Barberian

183 N.E.2d 109, 344 Mass. 759

CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

DecidedJune 1, 1962

StatusPublished

Cited by8 cases

This text of 183 N.E.2d 109 (Valley Oil Co. v. Barberian) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Valley Oil Co. v. Barberian, 183 N.E.2d 109, 344 Mass. 759 (Mass. 1962).

Pincite

Opinion

Decree affirmed. This is an appeal by the defendants from a final decree ordering them to convey to the plaintiff by warranty deed the gasoline station property located at the northwest corner of Andover and Dale streets in the town of Andover. The evidence is not reported. The judge made a report of material facts. The defendant Lusia Barberian was the owner of the property when she demised it by written lease dated July 31, 1952, to the Cities Service Oil Company. Under the terms of the lease the tenant had the right “to assign or sublet the premises in whole or in part, but no subletting shall release the tenant from its obligation hereunder.” The lease also contained an option to purchase. The defendant Dan Barberian signed the lease and agreed to join in a deed conveying title to the lessee if the lessee should purchase the premises. Cities Service Oil Company assigned its lease to the plaintiff who, in accordance with the terms of the lease, notified the defendant Lusia Barberian it was exercising the option to purchase. The defendants contend that clause 11 of the lease is ambiguous and does not give a right to assign the lease but rather only the right to assign or sublet the premises demised. There is no sound basis for this contention. Leases may be assigned or sublet in the absence of provisions in the lease that this cannot be done. Leitner v. Foster, 280 Mass. 128, 134. The option runs with the land and enures to the benefit of the plaintiff as assignee of the lease. Shayeb v. Holland, 321 Mass. 429, 432. There was no error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Decree affirmed. This is an appeal by the defendants from a final decree ordering them to convey to the plaintiff by warranty deed the gasoline station property located at the northwest corner of Andover and Dale streets in the town of Andover. The evidence is not reported. The judge made a report of material facts. The defendant Lusia Barberian was the owner of the property when she demised it by written lease dated July 31, 1952, to the Cities Service Oil Company. Under the terms of the lease the tenant had the right “to assign or sublet the premises in whole or in part, but no subletting shall release the tenant from its obligation hereunder.” The lease also contained an option to purchase. The defendant Dan Barberian signed the lease and agreed to join in a deed conveying title to the lessee if the lessee should purchase the premises. Cities Service Oil Company assigned its lease to the plaintiff who, in accordance with the terms of the lease, notified the defendant Lusia Barberian it was exercising the option to purchase. The defendants contend that clause 11 of the lease is ambiguous and does not give a right to assign the lease but rather only the right to assign or sublet the premises demised. There is no sound basis for this contention. Leases may be assigned or sublet in the absence of provisions in the lease that this cannot be done. Leitner v. Foster, 280 Mass. 128, 134. The option runs with the land and enures to the benefit of the plaintiff as assignee of the lease. Shayeb v. Holland, 321 Mass. 429, 432. There was no error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

183 N.E.2d 109, 344 Mass. 759, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/valley-oil-co-v-barberian-mass-1962.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack