VALLEY NATIONAL BANK v. M/Y CORSAIR F/K/A SWEET ILLUSION

CourtDistrict Court, Virgin Islands
DecidedMay 16, 2019
Docket3:16-cv-00047
StatusUnknown

This text of VALLEY NATIONAL BANK v. M/Y CORSAIR F/K/A SWEET ILLUSION (VALLEY NATIONAL BANK v. M/Y CORSAIR F/K/A SWEET ILLUSION) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, Virgin Islands primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
VALLEY NATIONAL BANK v. M/Y CORSAIR F/K/A SWEET ILLUSION, (vid 2019).

Opinion

DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. THOMAS AND ST. JOHN

VALLEY NATIONAL BANK, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil No. 2016-47 ) M/Y CORSAIR F/K/A Sweet ) ILLUSION, ) ) Defendant. ) )

APPEARANCES:

Claire Tagini Ryan C. Meade Quintairo, Prieto, Wood & Boyer, P.A. Miami, FL For Valley National Bank

JUDGMENT GÓMEZ, J. Before the Court is the motion of Valley National Bank for default judgment and for an order of sale against M/Y Corsair f/k/a Sweet Illusion. I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY Having reviewed the record, the Court makes the following findings of fact: 1. The M/Y Corsair f/k/a Sweet Illusion (the “Vessel”) is a 58’6” Tarquin Pilot House Motor Yacht built by Kha Shing Enterprises in 2004. Page 2

2. The owner of the Vessel is Chuck T, LLC (“Chuck T”). 3. On October 12, 2004, Chuck T borrowed $792,000 (the “loan”) from NFB Maritime, Inc., d/b/a First New England Financial (“NFB”). The loan was evidenced by an October 12, 2004, promissory Note (the “NFB Note”) in which Chuck T promised to pay NFB $792,000 plus interest, expenses, and fees. 4. Pursuant to the terms of the NFB Note, Chuck T was required to make monthly installment payments on the loan to NFB. The NFB Note also provides that Chuck T will be in default by failing to pay an installment. Further, the NFB Note provides that in the event of default, the NFB Note will become due and payable in its entirety. 5. On October 12, 2004, Chuck T executed an Adjustable Rate Rider (the “Rider”) to the NFB Note. The Rider set interest on the NFB Note at 6.6% per annum. Beginning on November 12, 2007, the interest rate would be adjusted annually by “adding the Wall Street Journal Prime Rate . .

. to a margin of 2.1%.” ECF No. 22, Exh. 1 at 22. 6. On October 12, 2004, Chuck T gave NFB a mortgage on the Vessel (the “NFB Mortgage”). The terms of the NFB Mortgage gave NFB the right to accelerate payment on the NFB Note in the event of a default and the right to sell or dispose Page 3 the Vessel at private sale or public auction. The terms of the Mortgage also gave NFB, and its assignees, the right to recover all costs, fees, disbursements, expenses, charges and attorney’s fees associated with enforcing the mortgage. The NFB Mortgage was signed by Charles Turlinski on behalf 7. of Chuck T. he NFB Mortgage indicates that Charles T Turlinski is a member of Chuck T. On October 13, 2004, NFB assigned its interest in the NFB 8. Mortgage to Ameribank. On April 15, 2008, Ameribank assigned its interest in the 9. NFB Mortgage to Enterprise National Bank of Palm Beach (“Enterprise National Bank”). On May 21, 2008, Chuck T executed and delivered a document 10. entitled “‘Restated’ Promissory Note” (“Restated Note”) to

Enterprise National Bank. In the Restated Note, Chuck T

promised to pay Enterprise National Bank $792,019.44 (the

“debt”). Pursuant to the terms of the Restated Note, Chuck

T was required to make monthly installment payments towards

the debt. For the first sixty monthly payments, the

interest rate on the debt was 7%. Thereafter, the interest

for each monthly payment was to be calculated as described

in the Restated Note. See ECF No. 1-6 at 1. Page 4

11. Under the Restated Note, Chuck T was required to make monthly payments beginning on June 12, 2008. 12. Enterprise National bank was succeeded by 1st United Bank, which purchased Enterprise National Bank’s parent company, Enterprise Bancorp. Thereafter, Valley National Bank merged with 1st United Bank, the result of which is that Valley National Bank is the successor to 1st United Bank. 13. On March 12, 2016, Chuck T failed to make a monthly payment and was in default under the terms of the Restated Note and the NFB Mortgage. 14. On May 19, 2016, Valley National Bank accelerated the amount due under the Restated Note and demanded that Chuck T pay the Restated Note in full. Chuck T has not cured its default. 15. On June 20, 2016, Valley National Bank commenced an action in rem against the Vessel seeking to foreclose on the NFB Mortgage. 16. On June 27, 2016, the Clerk of Court issued a warrant for

the arrest of the vessel. The United States Marshal arrested the Vessel on August 2, 2016. 17. From April 21, 2018, through April 28, 2018, Valley National Bank published notice of this action in the Virgin Islands Daily News. Page 5

18. No party has filed an answer or filed a claim against the Vessel. On July 18, 2018, the Clerk of Court entered default against the Vessel. 19. Chuck T is in default on the Restated Note. As of July 27, 2018, Chuck T is in debt to Valley National Bank in the principal amount of $472,543.71, plus interest in the amount of $201,165.28. Since July 20, 2018, interest has continued to accrue at a rate of $226.56 per day. In addition, Valley National Bank has incurred the following costs: $27,561.96 in attorney fees and costs; a $5,736 Marshal’s fee for the arrest of the vessel; $15,420 in custodian fees; $2,193.31 for stewardship and maintenance; $40,270.25 for wharfage, storage, and dockage; $35,255.99 in insurance premiums; and $1,111.07 in other miscellaneous costs. II. DISCUSSION Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(b)(2) allows courts to enter a default judgment against a properly served defendant who

fails to file a timely responsive pleading. Anchorage Assoc. v. V.I. Bd. Of Tax Rev., 922 F.2d 168, 177 n.9 (3d Cir. 1990). A motion for entry of default judgment must contain evidence of the following: (1) that default was entered; (2) that the defendant has not appeared; (3) that the defendant is not an Page 6

infant or incompetent; (4) that all pleadings were validly served upon the defendant; (5) the amount of judgment and how it was calculated; and (6) an affidavit of non-military service. See Bank of Nova Scotia v. Abdallah, No. CV 20012-0033, 2014 WL 2976232, at *3 (D.V.I. July 1, 2014). In addition, the Court must consider three factors when determining whether to grant a default judgment: “(1) [the] prejudice to the plaintiff if default is denied, (2) whether the defendant appears to have a litigable defense, and (3) whether defendant’s delay is due to culpable conduct.” Chamberlain v. Giampapa, 210 F.3d 154, 164 (3d Cir. 2000). III. ANALYSIS “Under the Ship Mortgage Act, a valid ship mortgage meeting the requirements of 46 U.S.C. § 31322 (“Section 31322”) is a ‘preferred mortgage,’ which ‘is a lien on the mortgaged vessel in the amount of the outstanding mortgage indebtedness secured by the vessel.’” Governor & Co. of Bank of Scotland v. Sabay, 211 F.3d 261, 270 (5th Cir. 2000) (quoting 46 U.S.C. §

31325(a)). In order to meet the requirements of Section 31322 the mortgage must: (1) include the whole of the vessel; (2) be filed in substantial compliance with 46 U.S.C. § 31321 (“Section 31321”); and (3) cover a documented vessel. 46 U.S.C. § 31322. Page 7

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
VALLEY NATIONAL BANK v. M/Y CORSAIR F/K/A SWEET ILLUSION, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/valley-national-bank-v-my-corsair-fka-sweet-illusion-vid-2019.