Valley Intervention Projects, Inc. and David G. Smith v. Tom Martine, Trustee, D/B/A Tom Martine, A/ka Thomas Michael

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedSeptember 11, 2003
Docket13-03-00459-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Valley Intervention Projects, Inc. and David G. Smith v. Tom Martine, Trustee, D/B/A Tom Martine, A/ka Thomas Michael (Valley Intervention Projects, Inc. and David G. Smith v. Tom Martine, Trustee, D/B/A Tom Martine, A/ka Thomas Michael) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Valley Intervention Projects, Inc. and David G. Smith v. Tom Martine, Trustee, D/B/A Tom Martine, A/ka Thomas Michael, (Tex. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion



NUMBER 13-03-459-CV



COURT OF APPEALS



THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS



CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

________________________________________________________________



VALLEY INTERVENTION PROJECTS, INC.,

D/B/A VALLEY HIGH CHARTER SCHOOL,

AND DAVID G. SMITH, Appellants,



v.


TOM MARTINE, TRUSTEE, D/B/A TOM

MARTINE A/K/A THOMAS MICHAEL MARTINE, Appellee.

________________________________________________________________



On appeal from the 404th District Court
of Cameron County, Texas.

________________________________________________________________



MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Hinojosa and Yañez

Opinion Per Curiam



Appellants, VALLEY INTERVENTION PROJECTS, INC., D/B/A VALLEY HIGH CHARTER SCHOOL, AND DAVID G. SMITH, attempted to perfect an appeal from a judgment entered by the 404th District Court of Cameron County, Texas, in cause number 2001-06-2996-G. After the notice of appeal was filed, appellants filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. In the motion, appellants state that they do not wish to pursue any further relief in this Court. Appellants request that this Court dismiss the appeal.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellants' motion to dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. Appellants' motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM



Opinion delivered and filed this

the 11th day of September, 2003.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Valley Intervention Projects, Inc. and David G. Smith v. Tom Martine, Trustee, D/B/A Tom Martine, A/ka Thomas Michael, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/valley-intervention-projects-inc-and-david-g-smith-texapp-2003.