Valley Camp Coal Co. v. Hill
This text of 537 F. App'x 253 (Valley Camp Coal Co. v. Hill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Valley Camp Coal Company seeks review of the Benefits Review Board’s decision and order affirming the administrative law judge’s award of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C. §§ 901-945 (2006). Our review of the record discloses that the Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. Valley Camp Coal Co. v. Hill, No. 12-0112-BLA (B.R.B. Nov. 26, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
537 F. App'x 253, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/valley-camp-coal-co-v-hill-ca4-2013.