Valley Baptist Medical Center, in Its Assumed or Common Name, Previously Named as Valley Baptist Hospital v. Sharon Satterfield, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Alfred Dean Satterfield, and Talman Ray Satterfield, Individually
This text of Valley Baptist Medical Center, in Its Assumed or Common Name, Previously Named as Valley Baptist Hospital v. Sharon Satterfield, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Alfred Dean Satterfield, and Talman Ray Satterfield, Individually (Valley Baptist Medical Center, in Its Assumed or Common Name, Previously Named as Valley Baptist Hospital v. Sharon Satterfield, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Alfred Dean Satterfield, and Talman Ray Satterfield, Individually) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-12-00343-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________
VALLEY BAPTIST MEDICAL CENTER, IN ITS ASSUMED OR COMMON NAME, PREVIOUSLY NAMED AS VALLEY BAPTIST HOSPITAL, Appellant,
v.
SHARON SATTERFIELD, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF ALFRED DEAN SATTERFIELD, DECEASED, AND TALMAN RAY SATTERFIELD, INDIVIDUALLY, Appellees. ____________________________________________________________
On appeal from the 357th District Court of Cameron County, Texas. ____________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Rodriguez, Benavides, and Perkes Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam
Appellant, Valley Baptist Medical Center, in its assumed or common name,
previously named as Valley Baptist Hospital, perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 357th District Court of Cameron County, Texas, in cause number
2011-DCL-5956-E. Appellant has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal on grounds it no
longer wishes to pursue this interlocutory appeal. Appellant requests that this Court
dismiss the appeal.
The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant=s motion to
dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See TEX. R. APP.
P. 42.1(a). Appellant=s motion to dismiss is GRANTED, and the appeal is hereby
DISMISSED. Costs will be taxed against appellant. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d)
("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant.").
Having dismissed the appeal at appellant=s request, no motion for rehearing will be
entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.
PER CURIAM
Delivered and filed the 16th day of August, 2012.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Valley Baptist Medical Center, in Its Assumed or Common Name, Previously Named as Valley Baptist Hospital v. Sharon Satterfield, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Alfred Dean Satterfield, and Talman Ray Satterfield, Individually, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/valley-baptist-medical-center-in-its-assumed-or-common-name-previously-texapp-2012.