Valleskey v. Flagship National Bank of Miami

508 So. 2d 541, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1486, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8824
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 16, 1987·No. No. 87-161·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge.

It is clear that attorney’s fees were properly assessed against the estate for the defense of the personal representative in a non-frivolous, but ultimately unsuccessful action by the beneficiaries to surcharge the p.r. for alleged improprieties in the performance of its duties.1 Anderson v. [542]*542Anderson, 468 So.2d 528 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985), pet. for review denied, 476 So.2d 672 (Fla.1985); § 733.609, Fla.Stat. (1985) (“In all actions challenging the proper exercise of a personal representative’s powers, the court shall award taxable costs ... including attorney’s fees.”).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Valleskey v. Flagship National Bank of Miami, 508 So. 2d 541, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1486, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8824 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

508 So. 2d 541 (Valleskey v. Flagship National Bank of Miami) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McDonnell v. McDonnell
657 So. 2d 1289 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)