Vallero v. Camilla

53 Colo. 312
CourtSupreme Court of Colorado
DecidedApril 15, 1912
DocketNo. 7216
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 53 Colo. 312 (Vallero v. Camilla) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Colorado primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Vallero v. Camilla, 53 Colo. 312 (Colo. 1912).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Gabbert

delivered the opinion of the court:

The hearing was solely upon a motion to dissolve the temporary injunction. For this reason, it was error to- dismiss the bill, although the showing made justified the dissolution of the temporary writ, as plaintiff still had -the right to a trial of the cause upon its merits, and to such relief as the case then made warranted. — Spar Con. M. Co. v. Casserleigh, 34 Colo. 454.

[313]*313On behalf of defendants in error, it is asserted that the complaint does not state a cause of action. Conceding, but not deciding, that this is correct, the defect of the complaint in this respect may have justified the dissolution of the temporary writ, but plaintiff should have been afforded an opportunity to amend, if so advised. She was deprived of this by the judgment of dismissal.

The judgment of the district court, dismissing the action, is set aside, and the case remanded with directions to reinstate on the docket, and for such further proceedings as will*1 be in harmony with this opinion.

Reversed in part and Remanded.

Mr. Justice Musser and Mr. Justice Hill concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Norris v. City of Lawton
1915 OK 160 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1915)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
53 Colo. 312, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vallero-v-camilla-colo-1912.