Home/Supreme Court of Connecticut/Valle v. Commissioner of Correction

Valle v. Commissioner of Correction

701 A.2d 338, 243 Conn. 909, 1997 Conn. LEXIS 389
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedSeptember 18, 1997
DocketSC 15773
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 701 A.2d 338 (Valle v. Commissioner of Correction) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Valle v. Commissioner of Correction, 701 A.2d 338, 243 Conn. 909, 1997 Conn. LEXIS 389 (Colo. 1997).

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 45 Conn. App. 566 (AC 16015), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that a prisoner serving multiple concurrent sentences imposed by different courts on different dates is entitled to have presentence confinement credit applied to each of these sentences when that credit represents the same period of presentence confinement?”

Madeline A. Melchionne, assistant attorney general, in support of the petition. Decided September 18, 1997

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Washington v. Commissioner of Correction
950 A.2d 1220 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2008)
Judd v. Warden, No. Cv00-0003267 (Nov. 12, 2002)
2002 Conn. Super. Ct. 14408 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2002)
Valle v. Commissioner of Correction
711 A.2d 722 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
701 A.2d 338, 243 Conn. 909, 1997 Conn. LEXIS 389, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/valle-v-commissioner-of-correction-conn-1997.