Valis v. Allstate Insurance

132 A.D.2d 658, 518 N.Y.S.2d 153, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 49203
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 20, 1987
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 132 A.D.2d 658 (Valis v. Allstate Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Valis v. Allstate Insurance, 132 A.D.2d 658, 518 N.Y.S.2d 153, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 49203 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Opinion

In an action to recover under a homeowners’ insurance policy, the defendant appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Burstein, J.), dated September 18, 1986, as denied that branch of its motion which was to strike the plaintiffs demand for punitive damages without prejudice to renew after the conclusion of disclosure.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, and that branch of defendant’s motion which was to strike the plaintiffs demand for punitive damages is granted.

The plaintiffs demand in the complaint for punitive damages was based on an allegation that the defendant insurer had failed to pay a claim for burglary insurance, "which conduct is * * * wilful and malicious”. However, it is well settled that "[a] claim for punitive damages against an insurer is cognizable in New York only in circumstances where a [659]*659plaintiff has made sufficient evidentiary allegations of ultimate facts of a fraudulent and deceitful scheme in dealing with the general public as to imply a criminal indifference to civil obligations” (Holoness Realty Corp. v New York Prop. Ins. Underwriting Assn., 75 AD2d 569, 570; Philips v Republic Ins. Co., 108 AD2d 845, affd 65 NY2d 1000; Catalogue Serv. v Insurance Co., 74 AD2d 837; Granato v Allstate Ins. Co., 70 AD2d 948; Royal Globe Ins. Co. v Chock Full O’Nuts Corp., 86 AD2d 315, 321). Allegations against an insurer for breach of an insurance contract, even a breach committed willfully, and without justification, as is alleged in the instant complaint, are insufficient for recovery of punitive damages (Catalogue Serv. v Insurance Co., supra). Accordingly, the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, and that branch of the defendant’s motion which was to strike the plaintiff’s demand for punitive damages is granted. Mangano, J. P., Eiber, Sullivan and Harwood, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Parker v. Smith
242 A.D.2d 373 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
Camelot Coach Corp. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
238 A.D.2d 369 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
Bread Chalet, Inc. v. Royal Insurance
224 A.D.2d 650 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
Ahmadi v. Government Employees Insurance
204 A.D.2d 374 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
Porter v. Allstate Insurance
184 A.D.2d 685 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
Lebron v. Allstate Insurance
179 A.D.2d 623 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
In re Bernstein
156 A.D.2d 683 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
Aldrich v. Aetna Life & Casualty Insurance
140 A.D.2d 574 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
132 A.D.2d 658, 518 N.Y.S.2d 153, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 49203, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/valis-v-allstate-insurance-nyappdiv-1987.