Valerio v. State

371 So. 2d 1100, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15298
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 19, 1979
DocketNos. LL-383, LL-384
StatusPublished

This text of 371 So. 2d 1100 (Valerio v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Valerio v. State, 371 So. 2d 1100, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15298 (Fla. Ct. App. 1979).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant pleaded nolo contendere to two charges of cocaine sale after the trial court denied his motion to compel disclosure of the identity of a confidential informant. He appeals both convictions, claiming error in the court’s denial of the motion. We affirm, noting first that appellant’s motion alleging the informant’s involvement was unsworn, and second that appellant rejected the state’s offer to have an in camera hearing to determine whether disclosure was necessary to his defense. See Munford v. State, 343 So.2d 67 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977), reversed on other grounds, 357 So.2d 706 (Fla.1978); Beasley v. State, 354 So.2d 934 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978).

McCORD, C. J., and BOOTH and LARRY G. SMITH, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Munford
357 So. 2d 706 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1978)
Beasley v. State
354 So. 2d 934 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1978)
Munford v. State
343 So. 2d 67 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
371 So. 2d 1100, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15298, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/valerio-v-state-fladistctapp-1979.