Valerio v. Scillia

CourtDistrict Court, D. Nevada
DecidedJune 15, 2020
Docket2:10-cv-01806
StatusUnknown

This text of Valerio v. Scillia (Valerio v. Scillia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Nevada primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Valerio v. Scillia, (D. Nev. 2020).

Opinion

3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4 DISTRICT OF NEVADA

5 GIOVANNI VALERIO, Case No. 2:10-cv-01806-GMN-EJY

6 Petitioner, v. ORDER 7 ANTHONY SCILLIA, WARDEN, et al., 8 Respondents. 9 10 For good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 11 1. The Joint Motion to Reopen and for Enlargement of Time for Briefing (ECF No. 89) is 12 GRANTED and the stay of this matter is LIFTED. 13 2. The Clerk of Court will REOPEN this habeas action. 14 3. The parties have until July 13, 2020, to file memorandum addressing their respective 15 positions as to whether an evidentiary hearing is still required for any issues going to the 16 timeliness of the federal petition following the Ninth Circuit’s en banc decision in Smith v. 17 Davis, 953 F.3d 582 (9th Cir. 2020).

18 DATED: June 15, 2020

19 ________________________________ 20 GLORIA M. NAVARRO UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anthony Smith v. Ron Davis
953 F.3d 582 (Ninth Circuit, 2020)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Valerio v. Scillia, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/valerio-v-scillia-nvd-2020.