Valerio v. Putnam Associates

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit

No. 98-1399

ELAINE VALERIO,

Plaintiff, Appellant,

v.

PUTNAM ASSOCIATES INCORPORATED,

Defendant, Appellee.

ERRATA SHEET

The opinion of this Court issued on April 9, 1999 is amended as follows:

On p.12, line 4 of the slip opinion, the end of the sentence after "(8th Cir. 1975)," should be replaced to read:

while the Second Circuit, as well as a previous panel of the Ninth Circuit, have held that a formal complaint to the government agency or a court is required. Lambert v. Genesee Hospital, 10 F.3d 46 (2d Cir. 1993); see also Lambert v. Ackerly, 156 F.3d 1018 (9th Cir. 1998), withdrawn and reh'g granted, 169 F.3d 666 (9th Cir. 1999).

On p.12, line 12 of the slip opinion, the end of the sentence after "court or agency," should be replaced to read:

the Second Circuit concluded that 215(a)(3) is unambiguous. See Genesee Hospital, 10 F.3d at 55.