Valerie Stringer-Earnest v. Department of the Navy

22 F.3d 1107, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 6883, 1994 WL 121041
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided March 31, 1994·No. 94-3194·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

22 F.3d 1107
NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order.

Valerie STRINGER-EARNEST, Petitioner,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF the NAVY, Respondent.

No. 94-3194.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

March 31, 1994.

60 M.S.P.R. 593.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

ORDER

The appellant having failed to pay the docketing fee required by Federal Circuit Rule 52(a)(1) within the time permitted by the rules, it is

ORDERED that the notice of appeal be, and the same hereby is, DISMISSED, for failure to prosecute in accordance with the rules.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Valerie Stringer-Earnest v. Department of the Navy, 22 F.3d 1107, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 6883, 1994 WL 121041 (Fed. Cir. 1994).

22 F.3d 1107 (Valerie Stringer-Earnest v. Department of the Navy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related