Valerie Steiner v. M & H Appliances

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 23-3562

___________________________

Valerie Steiner

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

v.

M & H Appliances Sales and Service

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee

____________

Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota

____________

Submitted: April 30, 2024 Filed: May 3, 2024

[Unpublished]

____________

Before LOKEN, SMITH, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.

Valerie Steiner, a former employee of M & H Appliances Sales and Service, appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment in her pro se

1 The Honorable Nancy E. Brasel, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota.

employment action. After careful review of the record and the parties’ arguments on appeal, we conclude that the grant of summary judgment was proper. See Collins v. Kansas City Mo. Pub. Sch. Dist., 92 F.4th 770, 770 (8th Cir. 2024) (reviewing grant of summary judgment de novo). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________