Valerie Steiner v. M & H Appliances
This text of Valerie Steiner v. M & H Appliances (Valerie Steiner v. M & H Appliances) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________
No. 23-3562 ___________________________
Valerie Steiner
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant
v.
M & H Appliances Sales and Service
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee ____________
Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota ____________
Submitted: April 30, 2024 Filed: May 3, 2024 [Unpublished] ____________
Before LOKEN, SMITH, and KELLY, Circuit Judges. ____________
PER CURIAM.
Valerie Steiner, a former employee of M & H Appliances Sales and Service, appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment in her pro se
1 The Honorable Nancy E. Brasel, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota. employment action. After careful review of the record and the parties’ arguments on appeal, we conclude that the grant of summary judgment was proper. See Collins v. Kansas City Mo. Pub. Sch. Dist., 92 F.4th 770, 770 (8th Cir. 2024) (reviewing grant of summary judgment de novo). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Valerie Steiner v. M & H Appliances, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/valerie-steiner-v-m-h-appliances-ca8-2024.