Valerie Scott v. Christiana Care Health Services, Inc.

CourtSuperior Court of Delaware
DecidedAugust 1, 2025
DocketN18C-04-028 KMM
StatusPublished

This text of Valerie Scott v. Christiana Care Health Services, Inc. (Valerie Scott v. Christiana Care Health Services, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Valerie Scott v. Christiana Care Health Services, Inc., (Del. Ct. App. 2025).

Opinion

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

VALERIE SCOTT and ERIC SCOTT, ) Individually and on behalf of the Minor ) Plaintiff, D.S., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) C.A. No. N25C-06-050 KMM ) v. ) ) CHRISTIANA CARE HEALTH ) SERVICES, INC., ) ) Defendant. )

Date Submitted: July 1, 2025 Date Decided: August 1, 2025

ORDER ON REVIEW OF AFFIDAVIT OF MERIT

1. Plaintiffs Valerie and Eric Scott filed this medical negligence action

individually and on the behalf of Minor Plaintiff D.S. on June 5, 2025. The

complaint alleges that D.S. sustained hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy, permanent

brain damage, and cerebral palsy as a direct result of the negligent fetal

monitorization and medical treatment provided by Defendant Christiana Care Health

Services, Inc. (“Christiana Care”) to Valerie Scott and D.S. in the labor and delivery

unit of Christiana Hospital. As required by 18 Del. C. § 6853, plaintiffs filed an

Affidavit of Merit.

2. On July 1, 2025, Defendant filed a Motion for In Camera Review of

the Affidavit of Merit pursuant to 18 Del. C. § 6853(d). 3. In healthcare negligence cases, a plaintiff must submit an affidavit of

merit as to each defendant, signed by an expert and accompanied by a current

curriculum vitae, which states that “there are reasonable grounds to believe that there

has been health-care medical negligence committed by each defendant.”1

Additionally, the affidavit must state that there are “reasonable grounds to believe

that the applicable standard of care was breached” by each defendant and that the

breach was a proximate cause of the complained of injuries.2 An expert signing the

affidavit must be licensed to practice as of the date of the affidavit and, in the 3 years

immediately preceding the alleged negligence, has been engaged “in the treatment

of patients and/or in the teaching/academic side of medicine in the same or similar

field of medicine” as the defendant.3 Finally, the expert is to be Board certified “in

the same or similar field of medicine” if the defendant is Board certified.4

4. While the statute and the affidavit of merit “play an important role in

preventing frivolous claims,” the requirements “are purposefully minimal.”5 The

1 18 Del. C. § 6853(a)(1). 2 18 Del. C. § 6853(c). 3 Id. 4 The statutory requirement of the expert being Board certified only applies when the defendant is a physician. See McNulty v. Correct Care Solutions, LLC, 2017 WL 1323711, at *2 (Del. Super. Apr. 7, 2017) (requirement of “same or similar” Board certification does not apply where defendant is not a physician); Zappaterrini v. St. Francis Hosp., Inc., 2009 WL 1101618, at *1 (Del. Super. Apr. 22, 2019) (“[B]ecause the defendant is not a physician, the statutory requirement of similar Board certification is not applicable.”). 5 Dishmon v. Fucci, 32 A.3d 338, 342 (Del. 2011). Court’s initial review is to “assume that statements in affidavits of merit are reliable

without additional evidentiary support.”6

5. The Court has reviewed plaintiffs’ Affidavit of Merit which (i) is signed

by the expert under oath; (ii) is accompanied by a current curriculum vitae; (iii)

includes the expert’s opinion that there are reasonable grounds to believe that the

applicable standard of care was breached by Christiana Care, and that the breaches

were a proximate cause of the alleged injuries; (iv) establishes that the expert was

licensed at the time of the affidavit; and (v) states that the expert currently is and has

been in active medical practice for the three years preceding the alleged negligent

acts. The expert is also Board certified in obstetrics and maternal fetal medicine.

6. Having reviewed in camera the Affidavit of Merit and accompanying

curriculum vitae of plaintiffs’ expert, the Court finds that the affidavit complies with

18 Del. C. § 6853(a)(1) and (c).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/Kathleen M. Miller Kathleen M. Miller, Judge

6 Id., at 342-43.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dishmon v. Fucci
32 A.3d 338 (Supreme Court of Delaware, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Valerie Scott v. Christiana Care Health Services, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/valerie-scott-v-christiana-care-health-services-inc-delsuperct-2025.