Valerie McConnin v. Karen Faust and Hunter L. Faust

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 27, 2025
Docket09-24-00450-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Valerie McConnin v. Karen Faust and Hunter L. Faust (Valerie McConnin v. Karen Faust and Hunter L. Faust) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Valerie McConnin v. Karen Faust and Hunter L. Faust, (Tex. Ct. App. 2025).

Opinion

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

__________________

NO. 09-24-00450-CV __________________

VALERIE MCCONNIN, Appellant

V.

KAREN FAUST AND HUNTER L. FAUST, Appellees

__________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 457th District Court Montgomery County, Texas Trial Cause No. 24-03-03791-CV __________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Valerie McConnin, Appellant, filed a notice of appeal from a judgment that

the trial court signed on November 22, 2024. Upon receiving the notice of appeal,

the Clerk of the Court issued a Bill of Costs for the filing fee for the appeal. See Tex.

R. App. P. 5, 12.1(b). By letter dated January 30, 2025, we warned Appellant that

Appellant had not paid the filing fee as directed in our previous letter and Bill of

Costs previously forwarded to Appellant. A Certified Bill of Costs for the filing fee

was enclosed and provided to Appellant. We also warned Appellant that unless the

1 filing fee was paid, the appeal would be dismissed without further notice on any date

after Monday, February10, 2025.

Appellant did not file a statement of inability to pay costs in this matter and

has not shown that she is entitled to proceed without payment of costs. See id. 20.1.

Furthermore, Appellant failed to comply with a notice from the Clerk of the Court

requiring a response within a specified time. See id. 42.3(c). We dismiss the appeal

for want of prosecution. See id. 42.3(b), 43.2(f).

APPEAL DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM

Submitted on February 26, 2025 Opinion Delivered February 27, 2025

Before Golemon, C.J., Wright and Chambers, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Valerie McConnin v. Karen Faust and Hunter L. Faust, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/valerie-mcconnin-v-karen-faust-and-hunter-l-faust-texapp-2025.