Valerie Lewis, by Her Next of Kin, Mrs. Olive Lewis v. Ruth Thomas, Principal, Charlotte Amalie High School

489 F.2d 700, 10 V.I. 649, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 6297
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit
DecidedDecember 26, 1973
Docket73-1023
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 489 F.2d 700 (Valerie Lewis, by Her Next of Kin, Mrs. Olive Lewis v. Ruth Thomas, Principal, Charlotte Amalie High School) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Valerie Lewis, by Her Next of Kin, Mrs. Olive Lewis v. Ruth Thomas, Principal, Charlotte Amalie High School, 489 F.2d 700, 10 V.I. 649, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 6297 (3d Cir. 1973).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

MARIS, Circuit Judge

This is an appeal by the defendants from an order of the district court granting a permanent injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with the attendance of *650 the plaintiff in the 12th grade class at Charlotte Amalie High School during the school year 1971-1972 and ordering the defendants to expunge from their records all reference to the dismissal of the plaintiff and the failing grades given to her for the last semester of the school year 1970-1971.

It appears that pursuant to the injunction the plaintiff was permitted to complete the 12th grade and that she graduated from the high school in June 1972, prior to the taking of the appeal. The appeal is, therefore, moot and must be dismissed on that ground. While the dismissal of the defendants’ appeal will allow the order of the district court to stand we note that under the law of the Virgin Islands, as set out in the Restatement of Judgments, § 69(2), 1 the order will not be conclusive against the defendants in a subsequent suit on a different cause of action.

The appeal will be dismissed as moot.

1

“§ 69. Effect of Appeal or Inability to Appeal.

“(2) Where a party to a judgment cannot obtain the decision of an appellate court because the matter determined against him is immaterial or moot, the judgment is not conclusive against him in a subsequent action on a different cause of action.” Restatement, Judgments § 69.
Under 1 V.I.C. § 4 this subsection of the Restatement states the common law rule in the Virgin Islands which is applicable to this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hartzog ex rel. Perez v. United Corp.
59 V.I. 58 (Superior Court of The Virgin Islands, 2011)
R & S Partnership v. Martin Schaffel Enterprises, Inc.
529 So. 2d 794 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
Lettsome v. Waggoner
672 F. Supp. 858 (Virgin Islands, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
489 F.2d 700, 10 V.I. 649, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 6297, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/valerie-lewis-by-her-next-of-kin-mrs-olive-lewis-v-ruth-thomas-ca3-1973.