Valerie LeMaster v. Ditech Financial LLC

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedApril 15, 2020
Docket18-3037
StatusUnpublished

This text of Valerie LeMaster v. Ditech Financial LLC (Valerie LeMaster v. Ditech Financial LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Valerie LeMaster v. Ditech Financial LLC, (8th Cir. 2020).

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________

No. 18-3037 ___________________________

Valerie LeMaster

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

v.

Ditech Financial LLC, formerly known as Green Tree Servicing LLC; Federal National Mortgage Association; Consumer Financial Protection Bureau

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees ____________

Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota ____________

Submitted: September 25, 2019 Filed: April 15, 2020 [Unpublished] ____________

Before LOKEN, GRUENDER, and KOBES, Circuit Judges. ____________

PER CURIAM.

Since our stay of this appeal as to the Federal National Mortgage Association (“Fannie Mae”) and Ditech Financial, LLC (“Ditech”) in light of Ditech’s commencement of bankruptcy proceedings, the bankruptcy court confirmed the bankruptcy plan. The plan includes a permanent injunction of claims that “interfere with the implementation or consummation of the Plan.” The parties dispute whether the claims against Fannie Mae and Ditech are barred by the injunction. But even if the claims are not barred by the injunction, we affirm the dismissal of LeMaster’s federal claims for lack of standing, see LeMaster v. Ditech Fin. LLC, 782 F. App’x 519 (8th Cir. 2019) (per curiam), and thus lack supplemental jurisdiction over LeMaster’s state law claims against Fannie Mae and Ditech, see 28 U.S.C. § 1367; ABF Freight Sys., Inc. v. Int’l Bhd. of Teamsters, 645 F.3d 954, 958 (8th Cir. 2011) (“[I]f a plaintiff lacks standing to sue, the district court has no subject-matter jurisdiction.”); 8th Cir. R. 47B. We thus affirm the district court and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. ______________________________

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Valerie LeMaster v. Ditech Financial LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/valerie-lemaster-v-ditech-financial-llc-ca8-2020.