Valerie Lee Stanton v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 24, 2019
Docket06-19-00009-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Valerie Lee Stanton v. State (Valerie Lee Stanton v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Valerie Lee Stanton v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

Nos. 06-19-00008-CR & 06-19-00009-CR

VALERIE LEE STANTON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3 Travis County, Texas Trial Court Nos. C-1-CR-17-500300 & C-1-CR-18-401515

Before Morriss, C.J., Burgess and Stevens, JJ. ORDER

Valerie Lee Stanton has appealed from convictions for deadly conduct and criminal

mischief. The clerk’s record in these matters was filed January 4, 2019, and the reporter’s record

was filed March 25, 2019. The appellant’s brief was due June 14, 2019.

Pending before this Court are Stanton’s motions for abatement to the trial court. In her

motions, Stanton contends that the reporter’s record does not contain any portions of the

punishment trial for either her conviction for deadly conduct in trial court cause number C-1-CR-

17-500300, or her conviction for criminal mischief in trial court cause number C-1-CR-18-401515.

Stanton maintains that she has asked the court reporter about the punishment hearing records but

has not received a response. In response to this Court’s inquiry regarding the missing portions of

the record, the court reporter indicated that she does not recall making a record of the punishment

hearing for either of Stanton’s convictions.

Since Stanton has raised issues regarding the accuracy of the reporter’s record after it has

been filed in this Court, we will submit this dispute to the trial court for resolution under Rule 34.6,

subsections (e) and (f), of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 34.6(e),

(f). We hereby abate this matter to the trial court to conduct an evidentiary hearing pursuant to

Rule 34.6, subsections (e) and (f), for the purposes of (1) determining whether all portions of the

record to which the parties are entitled have been provided to them and filed with this Court and

(2) identifying and correcting, if possible, any inaccuracies or deficiencies in the reporter’s record.

We instruct the trial court to conduct an evidentiary hearing within fifteen days of the date

of this order and to enter findings regarding the following:

2 1. Precisely what portions of the record Stanton (or any other party) claims are missing

and/or what parts of the record Stanton (or any other party) claims are inaccurate;

2. For each error or omission identified in response to No. 1 above, whether the issue

can be resolved by agreement as contemplated by Rule 34.6(e)(1) of the Texas Rules of Appellate

Procedure;

3. If such error or omission can be corrected by agreement, then the trial court is

instructed to take steps to ensure that the reporter’s record is corrected in accordance with the

parties’ agreement;

4. If such error or omission cannot be corrected by agreement, then the trial court is

instructed to take the steps outlined in Rule 34.6(e)(2) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure

to resolve the dispute and correct the record;

5. For each error or omission identified in response to No. 1 above, whether any

missing exhibit or portion of the reporter’s record has been lost or destroyed as contemplated by

Rule 34.6(f) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure;

6. For each exhibit or portion of the reporter’s record that is determined to be lost or

destroyed, if any, the trial court is instructed to take evidence on and enter findings regarding each

of the four factors set out in Rule 34.6(f) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure and to enter

recommendations regarding whether the appellant is entitled to a new trial as a result of the lost or

destroyed exhibit or portion of the record.

7. We also request that the trial court make any additional findings that it believes will

be helpful to this Court in fully and finally resolving all issues related to the record in this matter.

3 The trial court’s findings, as set forth above, shall be entered into the record of the case and

filed with this Court as a supplemental clerk’s record within ten days of the date of the hearing.

The reporter’s record of the hearing, and any certified corrections to the reporter’s record under

Rule 34.6(e)(2), shall be filed in the form of a supplemental reporter’s record within ten days of

the date of the hearing.

All appellate timetables are stayed and will resume on our receipt of the supplemental

record. We withdraw Stanton’s current briefing deadline and will establish a new briefing

schedule once the case is returned to our jurisdiction from abatement.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

BY THE COURT

Date: June 24, 2019

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Valerie Lee Stanton v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/valerie-lee-stanton-v-state-texapp-2019.