Valerie Lauren Mata v. the State of Texas
This text of Valerie Lauren Mata v. the State of Texas (Valerie Lauren Mata v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion issued January 29, 2026
In The
Court of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-25-01002-CR ——————————— VALERIE LAUREN MATA, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 228th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 1866374
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant Valerie Lauren Mata attempted to appeal from a judgment of
conviction for the offense of improper relationship with a student for which appellant
was sentenced to five years’ incarceration in the Correctional Institutions Division
of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. See TEX. PENAL CODE § 21.12(a). Appellant’s appointed counsel has advised the Court that appellant waived the right
of appeal.
The clerk’s record indicates that appellant pleaded guilty and as part of her
plea, she agreed to waive her right to appeal. The trial court’s certification of
defendant’s right of appeal certified that appellant had no right of appeal because
this was a plea-bargain case.
A defendant may waive her appeal as part of a plea even if sentencing is not
agreed upon, if consideration is given for that waiver. See Ex parte Broadway, 301
S.W.3d 694, 699 (Tex. Crim. App. 2009). For a waiver to be valid, the record must
show that the State gave up its right to a jury trial in exchange for the defendant’s
waiver of her right to appeal. See Carson v. State, 559 S.W.3d 489, 494 (Tex. Crim.
App. 2018). The appellate record indicates that appellant agreed to waive her right
of appeal in exchange for the State giving up its right to a jury trial. Because
appellant has no right of appeal, we must dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
See Chavez v. State, 183 S.W.3d 675, 680 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006).
Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. Any pending motions are dismissed as
moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Guerra, Caughey, and Dokupil.
Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Valerie Lauren Mata v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/valerie-lauren-mata-v-the-state-of-texas-txctapp1-2026.