Valeriani v. Prevost
This text of Valeriani v. Prevost (Valeriani v. Prevost) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Ell I ( RED AUG n 6 1014
STATE OF MAINE SUPERIOR COURT CUMBERLAND, ss CIVIL ACTION Docket No. CV-13-181
TIMOTHY VALERIANI, 1\Jb~- CM/ytl 0'7- ~ ~-1 L} C STAT£o urnberJand F MAIN£ Plaintiff SUpE.Ri~sR, Clerk's ok,· ,, couRT "Ice v. JUL 2 2 2014 ORDER ON MOTIONS IN LIMINE JOANN PREVOST, RtcttVto Defendant
After argument on the record on the parties' motions in limine, the following is
ordered:
DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO EXCLUDE UNCORRECTED PORTIONS OF HER
DEPOSITION TESTIMONY; PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO EXCLUDE REFERENCE TO
STIPULATION OF LIABILITY
The parties agree to stipulate to liability, which in this case means defendant's
negligence proximately caused some injury to plaintiff. Defendant will not testify.
Counsel are permitted to reference the fact of this stipulation in opening statements and
closing arguments.
PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO EXCLUDE REFERENCE TO DR. KAZILIONIS'S TWO
REPRIMANDS
The motion is granted.
DEFENDANT'S MOTION IN LIMINE TO EXCLUDE SUBSTANTIVE ADMISSION OF,
OR ILLUSTRATNE USE OR REFERENCE TO, PLAINTIFF'S EXHIBIT 29
Plaintiff may testify with regard to the assertions in the Quantification of Lost
Wages dated 10/16/13. Plaintiff's counsel will not use plaintiff's exhibit 29 during his
opening statement. Depending on plaintiff's testimony, use of plaintiff's exhibit 29 may be permitted during plaintiff's testimony and/ or plaintiff's closing argument.
DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO EXCLUDE PHOTOGRAPHS OF DEFENDANT'S
VEHICLE
The motion is denied. State v. Hurd does not address the issue of the
relationship between force and resulting injury addressed in the cases cited by plaintiff.
See State v. Hurd, 360 A.2d 525, 527-28, 527 n.S (Me. 1976); see, ~ Mason v. Lynch,
878 A.2d 588, 600-01 (Md. 2005); Brennan v. Demello, 921 A.2d 1110, 1118-19 (N.J.
2007).
DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO PRECLUDE DR. KAZILIONIS'S TESTIMONY ON THE
SUBJECT OF BIOMECHANCS
DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO LIMIT NUMBER OF PAIN AND SUFFERING
WITNESSES
The court defers ruling until trial.
The clerk is directed to incorporate this order into the docket by reference.
Date: -J/z¢1-
2 DEBORAH BUCCINA ESQ DOUGLAS DENHAM BUCCINA & ERNST PO BOX 7108 PORTLAND ME 04112-7108
\
WILLIAM ROBITZEK ESQ BERMAN & SIMMONS PO BOX 961 LEWISTON ME 04243-0961
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Valeriani v. Prevost, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/valeriani-v-prevost-mesuperct-2014.