Valeria Marie Garcia v. Manuel Garcia

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 16, 2011
Docket04-10-00427-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Valeria Marie Garcia v. Manuel Garcia (Valeria Marie Garcia v. Manuel Garcia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Valeria Marie Garcia v. Manuel Garcia, (Tex. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-10-00427-CV

Valeria Marie GARCIA, Appellant

v.

Manuel GARCIA, Appellee

From the 225th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2009-CI-17691 Honorable Larry Noll, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Rebecca Simmons, Justice Steven C. Hilbig, Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Delivered and Filed: March 16, 2011

DISMISSED AS MOOT

This is an appeal from a default divorce decree. At the time the decree was signed, only

one of the children born to Valeria Marie Garcia and Manuel Garcia was a minor. The

complaints raised by Valeria in her pro se brief relate to the children. After Valeria filed her pro

se brief, appellee filed written notice that Valeria died.

Ordinarily, an appeal in a civil case is not abated due to the death of a party after the

rendition of judgment. TEX. R. APP. P. 7.1(a)(1). “However, nothing on the face of Rule 04-10-00427-CV

[7.1(a)(1)] dispenses with the requirement that there be an actual existing controversy between

the litigants.” Olson v. Comm’n for Lawyer Discipline, 901 S.W.2d 520, 523 (Tex. App.—El

Paso 1995, no writ). “Neither the Texas Constitution nor our State Legislature has vested

[appellate courts] with the authority to render advisory opinions.” Id. at 522. “When there has

ceased to be a controversy between the litigating parties due to events occurring after judgment

has been rendered by the trial court, the decision of an appellate court would be a mere academic

exercise and the court may not decide the appeal.” Id. Because Valeria has died, “the questions

concerning custody of the children of the parties have become moot.” Walsh v. Walsh, 562

S.W.2d 501, 502 (Tex. Civ. App.—San Antonio 1978, no writ); see also Black v. Black, 673

S.W.2d 269, 270 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 1984, no writ). Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed

as moot.

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Olson v. Commission for Lawyer Discipline
901 S.W.2d 520 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1995)
Black v. Black
673 S.W.2d 269 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1984)
Walsh v. Walsh
562 S.W.2d 501 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1978)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Valeria Marie Garcia v. Manuel Garcia, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/valeria-marie-garcia-v-manuel-garcia-texapp-2011.