Valera v. FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION

25 So. 3d 1250, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 269, 2010 WL 173616
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 20, 2010·No. 3D09-2254·Published

Opinion

SHEPHERD, J.

Martin Valera appeals a final order of the Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission, upholding the dismissal of his appeal from a referee’s determination, on the ground it was not filed within twenty days from the mailing of the determination. See § 443.151(3)(a), Fla. Stat. (2009); Fla Admin. Code Rule 60BB-5.007 (2009). Mr. Valera admits he received the determination, including notice of his appellate rights. He argues we should reverse the order under review because he was dis *1251 tracted by personal matters, affording him “good cause” for relief from the strict deadline provided by the statute and dismissal rule. However, the statute and rule do not permit good cause exceptions to the dismissal rule. See Robinson v. Sun Bank & Trust Co., 685 So.2d 1325, 1326 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996); Riegler v. Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 633 So.2d 1182, 1182 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994); Leon v. Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 476 So.2d 761, 762 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985).

For this reason, we affirm the order of the Commission.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Valera v. FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION, 25 So. 3d 1250, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 269, 2010 WL 173616 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

25 So. 3d 1250 (Valera v. FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Leon v. Unemployment Appeals Com'n
476 So. 2d 761 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
Riegler v. Unemployment Appeals Commission
633 So. 2d 1182 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
Robinson v. Sun Bank and Trust Co.
685 So. 2d 1325 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)