Valenzuela v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Valenzuela v. State

136 So. 3d 722, 2014 WL 1028385, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 3767

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 18, 2014

DocketNo. 1D13-4717

StatusPublished

This text of 136 So. 3d 722 (Valenzuela v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Valenzuela v. State, 136 So. 3d 722, 2014 WL 1028385, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 3767 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s denial of the appellant’s claims that he was convicted of non-existent crimes, but remand the case for correction of a scrivener’s error in the judgment which states that the jury convicted the appellant in Count VI of false imprisonment. The record indicates that the jury found the appellant not guilty of this count.

AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED AND REMANDED IN PART, WITH DIRECTIONS.

ROBERTS, WETHERELL, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s denial of the appellant’s claims that he was convicted of non-existent crimes, but remand the case for correction of a scrivener’s error in the judgment which states that the jury convicted the appellant in Count VI of false imprisonment. The record indicates that the jury found the appellant not guilty of this count.

AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED AND REMANDED IN PART, WITH DIRECTIONS.

ROBERTS, WETHERELL, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

136 So. 3d 722, 2014 WL 1028385, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 3767, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/valenzuela-v-state-fladistctapp-2014.