Valenzuela v. State

803 So. 2d 706, 26 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 791, 2001 Fla. LEXIS 2279, 2001 WL 1511516
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedNovember 29, 2001
DocketNo. SC00-1843
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 803 So. 2d 706 (Valenzuela v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Valenzuela v. State, 803 So. 2d 706, 26 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 791, 2001 Fla. LEXIS 2279, 2001 WL 1511516 (Fla. 2001).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have for review Valenzuela v. State, 764 So.2d 777, 777 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000), a per curiam decision of the First District Court of Appeal citing as controlling authority the Third District Court of Ap[707]*707peal’s decision in Bover v. State, 732 So.2d 1187 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999), quashed, 797 So.2d 1246 (Fla.2001). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.; Jollie v. State, 405 So.2d 418, 420 (Fla.1981).

In accordance with our opinion in Bover v. State, 797 So.2d 1246 (Fla.2001), we quash the First District’s decision and remand this case to the First District for consideration in light of our recent decisions in Bover and Carter v. State, 786 So.2d 1173, 1180-81 (Fla.2001). In remanding this case, we express no opinion as to the merits of Valenzuela’s rule 3.800(a) claim.

It is so ordered.

WELLS, C.J., and SHAW, HARDING, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, LEWIS and QUINCE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bunkley v. State
882 So. 2d 890 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
803 So. 2d 706, 26 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 791, 2001 Fla. LEXIS 2279, 2001 WL 1511516, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/valenzuela-v-state-fla-2001.