Valenzuela v. Pascua Yaqui Tribe of Arizona

D. Arizona

Valenzuela v. Pascua Yaqui Tribe of Arizona

DecidedDecember 14, 2022

Docket4:21-cv-00476

StatusUnknown

This text of Valenzuela v. Pascua Yaqui Tribe of Arizona (Valenzuela v. Pascua Yaqui Tribe of Arizona) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Arizona primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Valenzuela v. Pascua Yaqui Tribe of Arizona, (D. Ariz. 2022).

Pincite

Opinion

1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 4 || Francisco J. Valenzuela, ) No. CV 21-476-TUC-JAS (MSA) 5 Plaintiff, ORDER 6 || vs.

Pasqua Yaqui Tribe of Arizona, ) Defendant. ; 9 ) 10 OO 1] Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation issued by United States 12 || Magistrate Judge Aguilera. A review of the record reflects that the parties have not filed any 13 || objections to the Report and Recommendation and the time to file objections has expired. 14 || As such, the Court will not consider any objections or new evidence. The Court has reviewed 15 □□ the record and concludes that Magistrate Judge Aguilera’s recommendations are not clearly 16 |] erroneous. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72; Johnson v. Zema Systems Corp., 17 || 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999); Conley v. Crabtree, 14 F. Supp. 2d 1203, 1204 (D. Or. 18 || 1998). Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: (1) Magistrate Judge Aguilera’s 19 || Report and Recommendation (Doc. 11) 1s accepted and adopted; (2) This case is dismissed 20 || and the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment and close the file in this case. 71 Dated this 14th day of December, 2022. 22 23 24

*° Honorable James A. Soto 27 United States District Judge 28

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 4 || Francisco J. Valenzuela, ) No. CV 21-476-TUC-JAS (MSA) 5 Plaintiff, ORDER 6 || vs.

Pasqua Yaqui Tribe of Arizona, ) Defendant. ; 9 ) 10 OO 1] Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation issued by United States 12 || Magistrate Judge Aguilera. A review of the record reflects that the parties have not filed any 13 || objections to the Report and Recommendation and the time to file objections has expired. 14 || As such, the Court will not consider any objections or new evidence. The Court has reviewed 15 □□ the record and concludes that Magistrate Judge Aguilera’s recommendations are not clearly 16 |] erroneous. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72; Johnson v. Zema Systems Corp., 17 || 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999); Conley v. Crabtree, 14 F. Supp. 2d 1203, 1204 (D. Or. 18 || 1998). Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: (1) Magistrate Judge Aguilera’s 19 || Report and Recommendation (Doc. 11) 1s accepted and adopted; (2) This case is dismissed 20 || and the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment and close the file in this case. 71 Dated this 14th day of December, 2022. 22 23 24

*° Honorable James A. Soto 27 United States District Judge 28

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Valenzuela v. Pascua Yaqui Tribe of Arizona, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/valenzuela-v-pascua-yaqui-tribe-of-arizona-azd-2022.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack