Valenzia v. Baltimore City Board of School Commissioners

Fourth Circuit

Valenzia v. Baltimore City Board of School Commissioners

602 F. App'x 124

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedMay 8, 2015

DocketNo. 14-2128

StatusPublished

This text of 602 F. App'x 124 (Valenzia v. Baltimore City Board of School Commissioners) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Valenzia v. Baltimore City Board of School Commissioners, 602 F. App'x 124 (4th Cir. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Timothy Valenzia appeals from the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of the Baltimore City Board of School Commissioners in his employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments on appeal, and we find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Valenzia v. Baltimore City Bd. of Sch. Comm’rs, No. 1:12-Cv-00243-CCB, 2014 WL 4661486 (D.Md. Sept. 17, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Timothy Valenzia appeals from the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of the Baltimore City Board of School Commissioners in his employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments on appeal, and we find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Valenzia v. Baltimore City Bd. of Sch. Comm’rs, No. 1:12-Cv-00243-CCB, 2014 WL 4661486 (D.Md. Sept. 17, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

602 F. App'x 124, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/valenzia-v-baltimore-city-board-of-school-commissioners-ca4-2015.