Valentino v. Rosenbaum

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Valentino v. Rosenbaum

237 A.D. 843

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 15, 1932

StatusPublished

This text of 237 A.D. 843 (Valentino v. Rosenbaum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Valentino v. Rosenbaum, 237 A.D. 843 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment modified by striking therefrom all provisions relating to specific performance and by providing that plaintiff shafi recover from defendant a money judgment only, to wit, a judgment for the sum of $700, with interest from February 2, 1931, and costs. As so modified the judgment is unanimously affirmed, without costs. Findings of fact and conclusions of law inconsistent herewith are reversed and appropriate findings and conclusions wiU be made. No opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Tompkins and Davis, JJ. Settle order on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment modified by striking therefrom all provisions relating to specific performance and by providing that plaintiff shafi recover from defendant a money judgment only, to wit, a judgment for the sum of $700, with interest from February 2, 1931, and costs. As so modified the judgment is unanimously affirmed, without costs. Findings of fact and conclusions of law inconsistent herewith are reversed and appropriate findings and conclusions wiU be made. No opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Tompkins and Davis, JJ. Settle order on notice.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

237 A.D. 843, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/valentino-v-rosenbaum-nyappdiv-1932.