Valentino v. Nasio Studio, Inc.
This text of 136 Misc. 826 (Valentino v. Nasio Studio, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Action for damages for loss of a family photograph left with defendant for enlargement. The court awarded plaintiff $100. There was no proof justifying the award. The measure of damages in such a case is the value to- the plaintiff, taking into consideration the cost of the picture lost, the probability of replacing it, etc. No award for sentimental value can be made. (Lake v. Dye, 232 N. Y. 209, at p. 214; Wamsley v. Atlas Steamship Co., 50 App. Div. 199.)
Judgment reversed and a new trial ordered, with ten dollars costs to appellant to abide the event.
All concur; present, Bijur, Callahan and Peters, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
136 Misc. 826, 242 N.Y.S. 277, 1930 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1300, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/valentino-v-nasio-studio-inc-nyappterm-1930.