Valentino v. Nasio Studio, Inc.

136 Misc. 826, 242 N.Y.S. 277, 1930 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1300
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided May 8, 1930·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Action for damages for loss of a family photograph left with defendant for enlargement. The court awarded plaintiff $100. There was no proof justifying the award. The measure of damages in such a case is the value to- the plaintiff, taking into consideration the cost of the picture lost, the probability of replacing it, etc. No award for sentimental value can be made. (Lake v. Dye, 232 N. Y. 209, at p. 214; Wamsley v. Atlas Steamship Co., 50 App. Div. 199.)

Judgment reversed and a new trial ordered, with ten dollars costs to appellant to abide the event.

All concur; present, Bijur, Callahan and Peters, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Valentino v. Nasio Studio, Inc., 136 Misc. 826, 242 N.Y.S. 277, 1930 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1300 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1930).

136 Misc. 826 (Valentino v. Nasio Studio, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tchiyuka v. State of New York
2023 NY Slip Op 23423 (New York State Court of Claims, 2023)
Kennedy v. McKesson Co.
448 N.E.2d 1332 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
Twersky v. Pennsylvania Railroad
152 Misc. 300 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1934)