Valentino Maghee v. John Ault

153 F. App'x 982
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Valentino Maghee v. John Ault. Read the opinion of the Court — 66 F. App'x 81
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided November 9, 2005·No. 05-1596·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Valentino Maghee appeals the district court’s * order dismissing Maghee’s 28 *983 U.S.C. § 2254 petition challenging for the second time discipline imposed in January 2001 for rule violations he committed while at an Iowa work-release center. Following careful review, we reject Maghee’s argument that he established cause for his procedural default for the reasons stated by the district court and by this court during Maghee’s earlier appeal, see Maghee v. Ault, 66 Fed. Appx. 81 (8th Cir. Apr.30, 2003) (unpublished per curiam); United States v. Bartsh, 69 F.3d 864, 866 (8th Cir.1995) (law-of-case doctrine). Accordingly, we affirm the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

*

The Honorable Ronald E. Longstaff, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Valentino Maghee v. John Ault, 153 F. App'x 982 (8th Cir. 2005).

153 F. App'x 982 (Valentino Maghee v. John Ault) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Thomas Chisolm Bartsh
69 F.3d 864 (Eighth Circuit, 1995)
Valentino Maghee v. John Ault
66 F. App'x 81 (Eighth Circuit, 2003)