Valentine v. Valentine

45 So. 2d 885
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedApril 25, 1950
StatusPublished
Cited by33 cases

This text of 45 So. 2d 885 (Valentine v. Valentine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Valentine v. Valentine, 45 So. 2d 885 (Fla. 1950).

Opinion

45 So.2d 885 (1950)

VALENTINE
v.
VALENTINE.

Supreme Court of Florida, Division A.

April 25, 1950.

*886 William J. Pruitt, Miami, for appellant.

Hubbard & Carr, Miami, for appellee.

THOMAS, Justice.

After a study of this case in the light of the briefs we are not disposed to interfere with the chancellor's decree, except that part of it directed to the "former home" of the parties. He found that this property was held as an estate by the entireties and was valued at $10,231. He thereupon ordered the defendant-husband to pay the plaintiff-wife one half that amount and ordered the latter to convey to the former all her interest. The statute, Section 689.15, Florida Statutes, 1941, and F.S.A., provides that "in cases of estates by entirety, the tenants, upon divorce, shall become tenants in common."

The chancellor, by his decree, severed the marriage relationship and decided that the parties owned equal interests in the estate. Once the marriage contract was dissolved and the proportionate share of each in the estate was fixed, appellant and appellee became tenants in common, and thereafter it was for them to determine whether the property should be partitioned or whether one should purchase the interest of the other.

The decree is reversed in this respect with directions to revise it so that it will provide simply that the property, held until the time of the divorce as an estate by the entireties, be owned by the parties in equal shares as tenants in common.

Affirmed in part; reversed in part.

ADAMS, C.J., and TERRELL and ROBERTS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Coltea v. Coltea
856 So. 2d 1047 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Faust v. Faust
505 So. 2d 606 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Hendricks v. Hendricks
312 So. 2d 792 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1975)
Ramirez v. Ramirez
309 So. 2d 25 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1975)
Moore v. Moore
311 So. 2d 152 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1975)
Weinman v. Weinman
310 So. 2d 442 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1975)
Venzer v. Venzer
308 So. 2d 544 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1975)
Walton v. Walton
290 So. 2d 110 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1974)
Naf v. Wahlberg
288 So. 2d 576 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1974)
Orange County Civic Facilities Authority v. State
286 So. 2d 193 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1973)
Toby v. Toby
280 So. 2d 523 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1973)
Owen v. Owen
284 So. 2d 384 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1973)
Walborsky v. Walborsky
258 So. 2d 304 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1972)
Farr v. Farr
249 So. 2d 761 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1971)
Sistrunk v. Sistrunk
235 So. 2d 53 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1970)
Thompson v. Thompson
223 So. 2d 95 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1969)
Bildner v. Bildner
219 So. 2d 749 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1969)
Pearson v. Pearson
213 So. 2d 304 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1968)
Massey v. Massey
205 So. 2d 1 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1967)
Ohmes v. Ohmes
200 So. 2d 849 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
45 So. 2d 885, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/valentine-v-valentine-fla-1950.