Valentine v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Valentine v. State

792 S.W.2d 631, 1989 Mo. App. LEXIS 1374, 1989 WL 111480

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 26, 1989·No. No. 56109·Published

Opinion

ORDER

The state appeals from a judgment granting movant’s Rule 27.26 motion after an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The state appeals from a judgment granting movant’s Rule 27.26 motion after an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Valentine v. State, 792 S.W.2d 631, 1989 Mo. App. LEXIS 1374, 1989 WL 111480 (Mo. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

792 S.W.2d 631 (Valentine v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.