Valentine v. Richardson
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-6242
RANDY L. VALENTINE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
D. RICHARDSON, Officer; LIEUTENANT PRESSLY; R. GOINS, Officer; OFFICER BENNET; OFFICER LABONTE; OFFICER CREASY; D. GARDO, Officer; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER WILLIAMS; OFFICER YOUNGBLOOD; JONATHAN TALLY, Officer; SERGEANT NATION; B. JONES, Officer; OFFICER DOE; KRISTY MCCRAW, Officer; GREENVILLE COUNTY,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
NURSE GAY; LEGESSE TEBEJE, M.D.; NURSE JUDY; LAWRENCE CRANE, Attorney; JOHN CALEB PEASE, M.D.; GREENVILLE HOSPITAL SYSTEM,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (4:05-cv-00485-HMH)
Submitted: June 26, 2008 Decided: July 1, 2008
Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Randy L. Valentine, Appellant Pro Se. Russell W. Harter, Jr., CHAPMAN, HARTER & GROVES, PA, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 - PER CURIAM:
Randy L. Valentine appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. Valentine v.
Richardson, No. 4:05-cv-00485-HMH (D.S.C. Jan. 7, 2008). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 3 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Valentine v. Richardson (Valentine v. Richardson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.