Valentine v. Point O'Woods Ass'n

171 A.D. 926
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 15, 1915·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The partition suit being quasi in rem, the policy of the law is to have all interests before the court (Code Civ. Proc. § 452), especially derivative rights from a common ancestor. After a motion to intervene has been noticed and then adjourned, and is pending, the suit may not be unqualifiedly withdrawn and discontinued. Hence the discretion of the court at Special Term to set aside such discontinuance, and to permit the interveners to come in and defend, notwithstanding this attempt to drop the suit being based on grounds and considerations peculiar to a partition suit, was rightly exercised. The order setting aside the discontinuance, restoring the Us pendens and admitting the interveners to come in and defend, is, therefore, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Valentine v. Point O'Woods Ass'n, 171 A.D. 926 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1915).

171 A.D. 926 (Valentine v. Point O'Woods Ass'n) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hicks v. Corlew
79 A.D.3d 1232 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)