Valentine v. Point O'Woods Ass'n

171 A.D. 926
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 15, 1915
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 171 A.D. 926 (Valentine v. Point O'Woods Ass'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Valentine v. Point O'Woods Ass'n, 171 A.D. 926 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1915).

Opinion

The partition suit being quasi in rem, the policy of the law is to have all interests before the court (Code Civ. Proc. § 452), especially derivative rights from a common ancestor. After a motion to intervene has been noticed and then adjourned, and is pending, the suit may not be unqualifiedly withdrawn and discontinued. Hence the discretion of the court at Special Term to set aside such discontinuance, and to permit the interveners to come in and defend, notwithstanding this attempt to drop the suit being based on grounds and considerations peculiar to a partition suit, was rightly exercised. The order setting aside the discontinuance, restoring the Us pendens and admitting the interveners to come in and defend, is, therefore, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hicks v. Corlew
79 A.D.3d 1232 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
171 A.D. 926, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/valentine-v-point-owoods-assn-nyappdiv-1915.