Valentine v. Nettles

260 F. App'x 563
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 27, 2007·No. No. 07-7234·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Randy L. Valentine appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Valentine v. Nettles, No. 4:06-cv-02314-HMH, 2007 WL 2105856 (D.S.C. July 19, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Valentine v. Nettles, 260 F. App'x 563 (4th Cir. 2007).

260 F. App'x 563 (Valentine v. Nettles) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related