Valentine v. Maxwell

207 N.E.2d 234, 2 Ohio St. 2d 146, 31 Ohio Law Rep. 43, 31 Ohio Op. 2d 237, 1965 Ohio LEXIS 508
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedMay 5, 1965
DocketNo. 39244
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 207 N.E.2d 234 (Valentine v. Maxwell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Valentine v. Maxwell, 207 N.E.2d 234, 2 Ohio St. 2d 146, 31 Ohio Law Rep. 43, 31 Ohio Op. 2d 237, 1965 Ohio LEXIS 508 (Ohio 1965).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The issues raised by petitioner are not cognizable in habeas corpus but must he raised by means of the statutory post-conviction remedy of appeal. Walker v. Maxwell, Warden, 1 Ohio St 2d 136.

Petitioner remanded to custody.

Taet, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O’Neill, Herbert, Schneider and Brown, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Everett v. Eberlin
114 Ohio St. 3d 199 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
207 N.E.2d 234, 2 Ohio St. 2d 146, 31 Ohio Law Rep. 43, 31 Ohio Op. 2d 237, 1965 Ohio LEXIS 508, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/valentine-v-maxwell-ohio-1965.