Home/Ohio Supreme Court/Valentine v. Maxwell

Valentine v. Maxwell

207 N.E.2d 234, 2 Ohio St. 2d 146, 31 Ohio Law Rep. 43, 31 Ohio Op. 2d 237, 1965 Ohio LEXIS 508
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided May 5, 1965·No. No. 39244·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The issues raised by petitioner are not cognizable in habeas corpus but must he raised by means of the statutory post-conviction remedy of appeal. Walker v. Maxwell, Warden, 1 Ohio St 2d 136.

Petitioner remanded to custody.

Taet, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O’Neill, Herbert, Schneider and Brown, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Valentine v. Maxwell, 207 N.E.2d 234, 2 Ohio St. 2d 146, 31 Ohio Law Rep. 43, 31 Ohio Op. 2d 237, 1965 Ohio LEXIS 508 (Ohio 1965).

207 N.E.2d 234 (Valentine v. Maxwell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Everett v. Eberlin
114 Ohio St. 3d 199 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2007)