Valentine v. Doane

California Supreme Court

Valentine v. Doane

1 Cal. Unrep. 91

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 5, 1860

DocketNo. 2522

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Cal. Unrep. 91 (Valentine v. Doane) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Valentine v. Doane, 1 Cal. Unrep. 91 (Cal. 1860).

Pincite

Opinion

BALDWIN, J.

This record involves merely a question of fact as to the possession and ownership of certain vegetables, as to both of which facts there was testimony direct and inferential on both sides. The referee made his report after hearing and seeing the witnesses, the most important of whom were Foueguera, and the district court refused to set aside the verdict.

It is unnecessary to appeal to us in such cases, as we have often held.

The judgment is affirmed.

I concur: Cope, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BALDWIN, J.

This record involves merely a question of fact as to the possession and ownership of certain vegetables, as to both of which facts there was testimony direct and inferential on both sides. The referee made his report after hearing and seeing the witnesses, the most important of whom were Foueguera, and the district court refused to set aside the verdict.

It is unnecessary to appeal to us in such cases, as we have often held.

The judgment is affirmed.

I concur: Cope, J.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Cal. Unrep. 91, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/valentine-v-doane-cal-1860.