Valentine v. Dist. Ct. (State)
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
KEANDRE VALENTINE, No. 84777 Petitioner, vs.
THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF
FILED
CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE JUL 0 8 2022 JACQUELINE M. BLUTH, DISTRICT EUZABETH A. BROWN JUDGE, CLERK OF SUPREME COURT
Respondents, By pti ryaek-M-06-"-- ..5 De
and
THE STATE OF NEVADA,
Real Party in Interest.
ORDER DISMISSING PETITION
This is an original petition for a writ of mandamus or prohibition. Petitioner has filed a motion to withdraw his petition. The unopposed motion is granted and this matter is dismissed.
It is so ORDERED.
A CI-•t J.
Hardesty
, J. J.
Stiglich Herndon
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
( 0) I947A (71?-,3P-19 0
cc: Hon. Jacqueline Bluth, District Judge Clark County Public Defender Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) I947A
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Valentine v. Dist. Ct. (State) (Valentine v. Dist. Ct. (State)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.