Valentine & Co. v. Mandel

New York Court of Common Pleas

Valentine & Co. v. Mandel

11 N.Y.S. 718, 19 N.Y. Civ. Proc. R. 155, 1890 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2323

CourtNew York Court of Common Pleas

DecidedAugust 29, 1890

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 11 N.Y.S. 718 (Valentine & Co. v. Mandel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Common Pleas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Valentine & Co. v. Mandel, 11 N.Y.S. 718, 19 N.Y. Civ. Proc. R. 155, 1890 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2323 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1890).

Pincite

Opinion

Allen, J.

Prior to the enactment of the statute which is embodied in section 2286 of the Code, there was no authority under the statutes of the state to release a person imprisoned fora contempt in proceedings supplementary to execution. Van Wezel v. Van Wezel, 3 Paige, 38. Such persons may now be relieved, under section 2286, and the defendant should make his application under t'hat section. The present motion must be denied, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Allen, J.

Prior to the enactment of the statute which is embodied in section 2286 of the Code, there was no authority under the statutes of the state to release a person imprisoned fora contempt in proceedings supplementary to execution. Van Wezel v. Van Wezel, 3 Paige, 38. Such persons may now be relieved, under section 2286, and the defendant should make his application under t'hat section. The present motion must be denied, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

11 N.Y.S. 718, 19 N.Y. Civ. Proc. R. 155, 1890 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2323, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/valentine-co-v-mandel-nyctcompl-1890.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack