Valentin v. MTA/New York City Transit Authority

108 A.D.3d 421, 967 N.Y.S.2d 835

This text of 108 A.D.3d 421 (Valentin v. MTA/New York City Transit Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Valentin v. MTA/New York City Transit Authority, 108 A.D.3d 421, 967 N.Y.S.2d 835 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

— Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Larry S. Schachner, J.), entered May 25, 2012, which denied plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment as untimely, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Contrary to plaintiffs contention, the 120-day limit imposed by CPLR 3212 (a) applies to cases that have been stricken from the trial calendar, at least where, as here, the 120-day period had expired before the case was struck from the calendar (see Rivera v City of New York, 73 AD3d 413 [1st Dept 2010], citing Brill v City of New York, 2 NY3d 648 [2004]). Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P., Acosta, Saxe, Freedman and Clark, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brill v. City of New York
814 N.E.2d 431 (New York Court of Appeals, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
108 A.D.3d 421, 967 N.Y.S.2d 835, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/valentin-v-mtanew-york-city-transit-authority-nyappdiv-2013.