Valentin v. Carrero
This text of 12 A.D.3d 522 (Valentin v. Carrero) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In a family offense proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 8, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Family Court, Kings County (Grosvenor, J.), dated December 19, 2003, which, after a hearing, directed him to remove barriers erected in the subject apartment in Brooklyn, and prohibited him from residing there.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
It was a provident exercise of discretion for the Family Court to bar the petitioner from residing in the subject apartment in Brooklyn in order “to stop the violence, end the family disruption and obtain protection,” the stated purposes of a family offense proceeding (see Family Ct Act § 812 [2] [b]). Santucci, J.P., Schmidt, Cozier and Rivera, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
12 A.D.3d 522, 783 N.Y.S.2d 869, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13677, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/valentin-v-carrero-nyappdiv-2004.