Valentin v. Candy Corner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Valentin v. Candy Corner

130 A.D.2d 486, 514 N.Y.S.2d 902, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 46458

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 4, 1987

StatusPublished

This text of 130 A.D.2d 486 (Valentin v. Candy Corner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Valentin v. Candy Corner, 130 A.D.2d 486, 514 N.Y.S.2d 902, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 46458 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Candy Corner appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Bernstein, J.), dated June 11, 1986, which denied its motion to dismiss the complaint insofar as it is asserted against it and granted the plaintiffs cross application to vacate its default in serving a bill of particulars on condition that the plaintiffs counsel pay $250 as a monetary sanction within 20 days after service of the order.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs; the time for the plaintiffs counsel to pay the sanction is extended until 10 days after service upon him of a copy of this decision and order, with notice of entry.

On the record before us, the Supreme Court properly va[487]*487cated the plaintiffs default in serving a bill of particulars and denied the appellant’s motion to dismiss the complaint insofar as it is asserted against it. Mangano, J. P., Bracken, Niehoff, Kooper and Spatt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Candy Corner appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Bernstein, J.), dated June 11, 1986, which denied its motion to dismiss the complaint insofar as it is asserted against it and granted the plaintiffs cross application to vacate its default in serving a bill of particulars on condition that the plaintiffs counsel pay $250 as a monetary sanction within 20 days after service of the order.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs; the time for the plaintiffs counsel to pay the sanction is extended until 10 days after service upon him of a copy of this decision and order, with notice of entry.

On the record before us, the Supreme Court properly va[487]*487cated the plaintiffs default in serving a bill of particulars and denied the appellant’s motion to dismiss the complaint insofar as it is asserted against it. Mangano, J. P., Bracken, Niehoff, Kooper and Spatt, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

130 A.D.2d 486, 514 N.Y.S.2d 902, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 46458, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/valentin-v-candy-corner-nyappdiv-1987.