Valentin v. Candy Corner, Foster Avenue Corp.

254 A.D.2d 272, 678 N.Y.S.2d 382, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10096
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 5, 1998
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 254 A.D.2d 272 (Valentin v. Candy Corner, Foster Avenue Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Valentin v. Candy Corner, Foster Avenue Corp., 254 A.D.2d 272, 678 N.Y.S.2d 382, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10096 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant New York City Transit Authority appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Garry, J.), entered July 3, 1997, [273]*273which, upon a jury verdict, is in favor of the plaintiff and against it in the principal sum of $150,000.

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the complaint is dismissed.

On October 31, 1981, the plaintiff, while in an arcade, was accidentally shot in the back by the defendant Benjamin Wilson, a New York City Transit Authority Police Officer. Wilson was off-duty and was moonlighting as a game-room attendant at the time of the incident. The altercation which led to the shooting involved an individual who is not a party to this action.

To invoke the doctrine of respondeat superior, the “[p]laintiff has the burden of establishing by a fair preponderance of the credible evidence that the act complained of occurred while [the defendant police officer] was acting within the scope of his employment for the City of New York” (Hacker v City of New York, 26 AD2d 400, 402, affd 20 NY2d 722, cert denied 390 US 1036; see also, McDowell v City of New York, 208 AD2d 507). Here, the jury verdict as against the New York City Transit Authority cannot be sustained because the plaintiff has failed to establish that Wilson was acting within the scope of his employment with the New York City Transit Authority Police Department (see, Pekarsky v City of New York, 240 AD2d 645; see also, McDowell v City of New York, supra). Bracken, J. P., Ritter, Thompson and Krausman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Campos v. City of New York
195 Misc. 2d 624 (New York Supreme Court, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
254 A.D.2d 272, 678 N.Y.S.2d 382, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10096, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/valentin-v-candy-corner-foster-avenue-corp-nyappdiv-1998.