Valenti v. Zoning Board

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Valenti v. Zoning Board

714 A.2d 8, 244 Conn. 917, 1998 Conn. LEXIS 155

CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut

DecidedApril 8, 1998

DocketSC 15908

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 714 A.2d 8 (Valenti v. Zoning Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Valenti v. Zoning Board, 714 A.2d 8, 244 Conn. 917, 1998 Conn. LEXIS 155 (Colo. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

The defendants Anthony J. Torraca and Francis Krackowski’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 47 Conn. App. 937 (AC 16235), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the trial court improperly substitute its judgment for that of the zoning board of appeals and improperly [918]*918focus on whether a material change in circumstances existed, rather than on whether the record before it supported the board’s finding of hardship, in violation of the Appellate Court’s decision in Fernandes v. Zoning Board of Appeals, 24 Conn. App. 49, cert. granted, 218 Conn. 909 (1991), rev’d on court order for failure to defend with due diligence?”

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 15908. Peter J. Bartinik, Sr., in support of the petition. Decided April 8, 1998

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The defendants Anthony J. Torraca and Francis Krackowski’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 47 Conn. App. 937 (AC 16235), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the trial court improperly substitute its judgment for that of the zoning board of appeals and improperly [918]*918focus on whether a material change in circumstances existed, rather than on whether the record before it supported the board’s finding of hardship, in violation of the Appellate Court’s decision in Fernandes v. Zoning Board of Appeals, 24 Conn. App. 49, cert. granted, 218 Conn. 909 (1991), rev’d on court order for failure to defend with due diligence?”

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 15908. Peter J. Bartinik, Sr., in support of the petition. Decided April 8, 1998

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

714 A.2d 8, 244 Conn. 917, 1998 Conn. LEXIS 155, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/valenti-v-zoning-board-conn-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack