Valenti v. Zoning Board

714 A.2d 8, 244 Conn. 917, 1998 Conn. LEXIS 155
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided April 8, 1998·No. SC 15908·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The defendants Anthony J. Torraca and Francis Krackowski’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 47 Conn. App. 937 (AC 16235), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the trial court improperly substitute its judgment for that of the zoning board of appeals and improperly [918] focus on whether a material change in circumstances existed, rather than on whether the record before it supported the board’s finding of hardship, in violation of the Appellate Court’s decision in Fernandes v. Zoning Board of Appeals, 24 Conn. App. 49, cert. granted, 218 Conn. 909 (1991), rev’d on court order for failure to defend with due diligence?”

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 15908. Peter J. Bartinik, Sr., in support of the petition. Decided April 8, 1998

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Valenti v. Zoning Board, 714 A.2d 8, 244 Conn. 917, 1998 Conn. LEXIS 155 (Colo. 1998).

714 A.2d 8 (Valenti v. Zoning Board) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Laurel Beach Assn. v. Milford Zoning Brd., No. Cv99 06 58 98 (Mar. 15, 2000)
2000 Conn. Super. Ct. 4650 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2000)