Valenti v. Constantine

New York Supreme Court

Valenti v. Constantine

34 N.Y.S. 1150, 96 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 607, 68 N.Y. St. Rep. 883

DecidedJuly 26, 1895

StatusPublished

This text of 34 N.Y.S. 1150 (Valenti v. Constantine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Valenti v. Constantine, 34 N.Y.S. 1150, 96 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 607, 68 N.Y. St. Rep. 883 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1895).

Pincite

Opinion

PRATT, J.

We are of opinion that the referee’s conclusions are sustained by the testimony. Not only was there considerable evidence that Constantine had personal notice of the work done by the plaintiffs, but it seems pretty well established that the tenant had authority to make repairs. He made them for some years, and, until the present instance, his authority was never questioned. There are no exceptions that require notice, and judgment is affirmed, with costs. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PRATT, J.

We are of opinion that the referee’s conclusions are sustained by the testimony. Not only was there considerable evidence that Constantine had personal notice of the work done by the plaintiffs, but it seems pretty well established that the tenant had authority to make repairs. He made them for some years, and, until the present instance, his authority was never questioned. There are no exceptions that require notice, and judgment is affirmed, with costs. All concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

34 N.Y.S. 1150, 96 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 607, 68 N.Y. St. Rep. 883, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/valenti-v-constantine-nysupct-1895.