Valente v. Valente

114 A.D.2d 950, 495 N.Y.S.2d 918, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 53989
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Valente v. Valente. Read the opinion of the Court — 114 A.D.2d 951

Opinion

—In an action, inter alia, to impose a constructive trust upon certain real property for plaintiff’s benefit, plaintiff appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Hyman, J.), entered October 29, 1984, as, after a nonjury trial, dismissed her cause of action for the imposition of a constructive trust.

Judgment affirmed, insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

[951]*951The trial court properly dismissed plaintiff’s cause of action seeking the imposition of a constructive trust upon certain real property inasmuch as she failed to establish the necessary elements for such a claim (see, Sharp v Kosmalski, 40 NY2d 119, 121; Scivoletti v Marsala, 97 AD2d 401, 402, affd 61 NY2d 806). Mangano, J. P., Thompson, Bracken and Brown, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Valente v. Valente, 114 A.D.2d 950, 495 N.Y.S.2d 918, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 53989 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

114 A.D.2d 950 (Valente v. Valente) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sharp v. Kosmalski
351 N.E.2d 721 (New York Court of Appeals, 1976)
Scivoletti v. Marsala
462 N.E.2d 126 (New York Court of Appeals, 1984)
Scivoletti v. Marsala
97 A.D.2d 401 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)