Valente v. Cosentino

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Valente v. Cosentino

105 N.E. 551, 218 Mass. 125, 1914 Mass. LEXIS 1340

CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

DecidedMay 25, 1914

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 105 N.E. 551 (Valente v. Cosentino) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Valente v. Cosentino, 105 N.E. 551, 218 Mass. 125, 1914 Mass. LEXIS 1340 (Mass. 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

Loring, J.

The only defense to the plaintiff’s demand was that the claim sued on had been proved in bankruptcy, and so was merged in a judgment.

There is no foundation for the contention. For a full explanation of the matter, see Lowell on Bankruptcy, § 219.

[126]*126In our opinion the exceptions are frivolous and intended for delay.

The exceptions must be overruled with double costs from the time the exceptions were allowed; and the rate of interest from that time is to be twelve per cent a year. It is

So ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI