Valencia v. Armada Skilled Home Care of NM LLC

District Court, D. New Mexico·Decided August 11, 2020·No. 1:18-cv-01071·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

GRETCHEN VALENCIA, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,

Plaintiff,

vs. Civ. No. 18-1071 KG/JFR

ARMADA SKILLED HOME CARE OF NEW MEXICO, LLC; ARMADA HOME HEALTHCARE OF SOCORRO, LLC; and CHRISTOPHER TAPIA,

Defendants.

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION

THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Proposed Findings of Fact and Recommended Disposition by United States Magistrate Judge John F. Robbenhaar, filed July 23, 2020. (Doc. 61). Objections were due by no later than August 6, 2020. The parties have not filed any objections. The failure to make timely objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition waives appellate review of both factual and legal questions. U.S. v. One Parcel of Real Property, 73 F.3d 1057, 1059 (10th Cir. 1996). IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition (Doc. 61) are ADOPTED; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Emergency Motion for Protective Order, Issuance of Corrective Notice, and Sanctions (Doc. 48) is not well taken and is DENIED; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants’ request that Plaintiff withdraw her electronic notice with hyperlinks is DENIED.

UNITED STATES DISTRICPJUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Valencia v. Armada Skilled Home Care of NM LLC, (D.N.M. 2020).

Valencia v. Armada Skilled Home Care of NM LLC (Valencia v. Armada Skilled Home Care of NM LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.