Valencia, Jr. (Jose) v. State
This text of Valencia, Jr. (Jose) v. State (Valencia, Jr. (Jose) v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
from appellant's knowing acquiescence in existing conditions, 2 and the State may suffer prejudice from the delay. See Hart v. State, 116 Nev. 558, 563-64, 1 P.3d 969, 972 (2000). Therefore, the district court did not err in denying the motion to withdraw a guilty plea. Accordingly, we ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.
Hardesty
ek 3+‘ Parragui
cc: Thomas L. Stockard, District Judge Robert E. Estes, Senior Judge Jose Luis Valencia, Jr. Attorney General/Carson City Churchill County District Attorney Churchill County Clerk
2 Appellant previously filed a motion to withdraw his guilty plea in 2009. Valencia v. State, Docket No. 55317 (Order of Affirmance, May 7, 2010). He failed to demonstrate why the claims raised in his current motion could not have been raised in his previous motion.
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (0) 1947A
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Valencia, Jr. (Jose) v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/valencia-jr-jose-v-state-nev-2013.